View Single Post
  #48426  
Old 19-03-2019, 03:04 PM
Joined2005 Joined2005 is offline
Samster
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 2,299
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 453 Post(s)
My Reputation: Points: 9051 / Power: 10
Joined2005 has a reputation beyond reputeJoined2005 has a reputation beyond reputeJoined2005 has a reputation beyond reputeJoined2005 has a reputation beyond reputeJoined2005 has a reputation beyond reputeJoined2005 has a reputation beyond reputeJoined2005 has a reputation beyond reputeJoined2005 has a reputation beyond reputeJoined2005 has a reputation beyond reputeJoined2005 has a reputation beyond reputeJoined2005 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: TCSS thread "My favourite MASSAGE girls"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Franco_Barsei View Post

Since we're on this issue of fake photos, red flags, and related stuff, I had this encounter last year (finally sharing it! lol) where the massage was decent, the body was tight (tall, toned and perky B cups), attitude was good as well.

But the face was off. Like someone in her 40s.

I remember her opening the door with her hair covering part of her face. I saw the part that was uncovered and saw she was really quite mature-looking.

At that stage, I had the "mai hiam still okay"; after all, the initial impression of her bod and attitude was good.

The ML in question?
https://sglonelyguys.info/faye-massage/

She is really tall and toned, with perky boobs. The bikini photo in the advert is as it is in real life. With that bod, she would be an attractive overall package... 10 or more years ago.

Yes, she is one aunty who works hard in the gym, take nothing away from her.

Guess that's the problem with blurred face photos. Just sharing.
I also tried her based on the pictures. When door opened, what I saw was a very elegant milf with nice body so I proceeded to try. Massage was pretty good, body well toned indeed. Still better than two others I tried on my own.