Quote:
Originally Posted by Rickey
...
as for why they didn't fight for Harry Kane, it is becos he is too expensive n old n not worth the high cost of getting him something which many fans r emphatically saying which ETH n I don't agree but most importantly it is becos his club doesn't want to sell him to another arch-rival in the premier league n also becos they don't hv sufficient funds to pay for Kane as the greedy American owners do not want to spend more on the club...
Now looking forward to tomorrow morning 9.00 am for their next friendly match against Dortmund, Sancho's previous team...lose again n the signs for next season won't be good even with these new players joining them
|
Utd's budget is limited by FFP. Kane's price would have busted it and we would face sanctions by UEFA. As it is, we have already been fined for a small infraction. And we know what a bitch Levy is to work with on a deal. Everyone is basically calling his bluff now and waiting for Kane to run his contract down. Now the Spur's owner Joe Lewis is kan cheong already - told Levy to sell if contract not renewed.
Anyway, seems Hojlund's deal has been agreed. And we are paying more for him than City did for Haaland.
Not in time for Dortmund, but hope to at least see him for Bilbao, or Lens? Not sure which is for the senior squad.