![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Are They In This Forum??
Singapore - Dr Julian Ong Kian Peng, a surgeon in private practice, lost his defamation suit against a woman who told others that he had colluded with another specialist to take advantage of vulnerable female patients "to satisfy their immoral desires".
His action against her was dismissed with costs on April 3 by District Judge Lynette Yap, who said the woman was justified in her claims. The other doctor is Dr Chan Herng Nieng, who was a senior consultant psychiatrist at Singapore General Hospital (SGH) at that time. He is now in private practice. The woman had an extramarital relationship with Dr Chan from January 2017 till May 2018. While the two were on holiday in Eastern Europe in April 2018, she accessed his phone and took photographs of several WhatsApp messages between him and Dr Ong. This led to the ending of their relationship the following month. On June 19, she filed a complaint against Dr Chan with the Singapore Medical Council (SMC). The SMC told her on Dec 5 last year: "The Complaints Committee is at the final stage of its inquiry and will be writing to inform you of the outcome in due course." She has yet to hear the committee's decision. In June 2018, she sent e-mails to several doctors, mostly Dr Chan's colleagues, department heads and management at SGH, telling them that she had filed a complaint against him with the SMC. She included a copy of her complaint to the SMC which accused him of: a) Colluding with Dr Ong to take advantage of vulnerable women patients. b) That he used his position to source and groom patients who then became victims. c) Exchanged potential patients and colleagues deemed to be easily taken advantage of, to satisfy their immoral desires. The e-mails were also sent to two doctors in private practice. Dr Ong, who works at Julian Ong Endoscopy & Surgery at Mount Elizabeth Specialist Centre at Irrawaddy Road, commenced action against her on July 4, 2018. He said she had injured his reputation and well-being, and he had suffered distress, embarrassment and hurt feelings. The judge however found that the woman's claims were justified. Judge Yap said: "The main charge or sting which she needed to justify was that Dr Chan colluded with the plaintiff to take advantage of vulnerable female patients, she suspected they used their position as doctors to source for patients to have sex with, and they exchanged information about these women." During the hearing, Dr Ong admitted that he had suggested that Dr Chan, the woman and another person have a foursome. At that time, the woman was both Dr Chan's lover and patient. Their WhatsApp messages were quite damning. Dr Ong had provided his patient's contact details to Dr Chan, telling him to "feel free to play your game" and other comments which he told the court was a "bad joke" and not a reference to anal sex. "I found his explanation incredulous," said the judge, as the two doctors were discussing how to meet more women for sex. Dr Ong also shared a naked photo of another woman, describing her breasts and saying he was giving Dr Chan a "preview". Dr Chan admitted that Dr Ong had introduced the woman to him and they had sex. Another message sent by Dr Ong said: "But we need to meet more of these sluts leh." In another message, he criticised Dr Chan for his recent failure to provide enough women for their sexual activities and for him to "better buck the f*** up". One of Dr Chan's messages to Dr Ong said sex was never enough for him and he "need(s) new chicks" and "was doing seven to eight a day over the weekend". District Judge Yap said these and other messages showed that the woman's claims were "substantially true". Aside from patients, the two doctors had also exchanged information about colleagues they could potentially have sex with. The judge rejected the argument by Dr Ong's lawyer that there was no proof that these women were vulnerable. She said the relationship between doctor and patient is necessarily one of trust. She also noted that Dr Chan's practice "involves patients with mental health issues". District Judge Yap added: "It is this court's view that any doctor who seeks to have sex with his patient or pass a patient to another doctor to have sex with that patient, is interacting with a vulnerable person." |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
interesting sex lives of our ever efficient doctors! more sleaze please!
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are They In This Forum??
Kiss and Tell.
Probably mistress asked for more money and he didn't pay up... |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Are They In This Forum??
Oh my... that's my doc! what are the chances finding out both your dentist and doctors have some bad press on them of a sexual nature within the same year..
just found out recently my dentist was charged with molestation recently... -face palm- |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are They In This Forum??
haha. so do you have a fling with your doc?
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Are They In This Forum??
Docs are still fucking human & fucking horny !
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Are They In This Forum??
Very easy for doctors to attract girls....good pay, got status and big bragging rights for the girls. They re not the only ones ....i have a doctor friend and lawyr friend who have the same ECAs. They don't even ned to try hard. Just appear nice n once girls know their occupation, they will stick to them like koala bear.
Rem a recent case of a doc who bashed his ex gf?
__________________
Women are decent only because they have not experienced orgasm ![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are They In This Forum??
bro iloveu4ever
up you 15 points wonder whether these are in this forum Quote:
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are They In This Forum??
I checked the photo of the woman who filed the complaint.
One word: chio! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are They In This Forum??
Quote:
Are you part of the covid 19 tracing team? |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are They In This Forum??
https://www.todayonline.com/singapor...or-took-sexual
And the girl who made the complain, who was having the extra maritial affair.... Serene Tiong, biz development manager at Thomson Medical Centre.. ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
UpList: Empty Min 7 to exchange. Thks Pls CHECK properly before PMing to say nvr rtn etc etc. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are They In This Forum??
Such photos are taken from such a viewpoint to mask fattiness.
But then again, Dr Chan looks ugly as fuck. I've seen better looking anus compared to his face. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are They In This Forum??
免钱的通常最贵...
![]() ![]()
__________________
人帅抱紧,人丑报警 人帅真好,人丑性骚扰 ![]() FOC is the most expensive if it's too good to be true, it usually is round2: simplyunperfect, WOOHOO, WankJanice |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are They In This Forum??
haha that's a good one.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are They In This Forum??
Quote:
|
Advert Space Available |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
problems access to forum.all the same?is singtel is targetting the forum ? | LifeMiron | Newbie Issues/Say "Hi"/Testing/Tech stuff | 11 | 21-11-2011 12:49 AM |