BBBJ compared protected anal sex

[freethinker]

1. Just like to find out what are fellow bros views on having BBBJ versus anal sex with condom. Which one is actually less risky (knowing that both carries some risk). Most gals provide BBBJ rather than anal sex. However, doesn't protected anal sex (no breakage or slippage) provide more protection for the gal compared to BBBJ since there is no direct contact with the skin? (could it be that anal sex might not be desirable to the gal as she is not in control and might be more painful?)

2. Secondly, which one is more desirable for the guy? (my view is protected anal rather than BBBJ).

Pardon me if my first post in this forum is not good enough (i did a search to prevent duplicates too).

[peanut123]

Originally Posted by freethinker

1. Just like to find out what are fellow bros views on having BBBJ versus anal sex with condom. Which one is actually less risky (knowing that both carries some risk). Most gals provide BBBJ rather than anal sex. However, doesn't protected anal sex (no breakage or slippage) provide more protection for the gal compared to BBBJ since there is no direct contact with the skin? (could it be that anal sex might not be desirable to the gal as she is not in control and might be more painful?)

2. Secondly, which one is more desirable for the guy? (my view is protected anal rather than BBBJ).

Pardon me if my first post in this forum is not good enough (i did a search to prevent duplicates too).

Your question is rather silly. If the condom does not break, then of coz anal is safer since there is no fluid exchange. BBBJ carries a moderate risk of STDs since you are not protected.

Preference is of course a purely personal choice. I prefer BJ to Anal. Anal is disgusting to me, but this is purely subjective. To me, putting your dick into an anus is like putting your dick into a toilet bowl. Besides, I'm sure its pretty painful for the girl. Why the hell would I want to cause her pain ? And... the chances of the condom breaking is higher than vaginal sex, since the ass is usually tighter.

Lastly, one of the good things about BJs is that theres alot of variety, in that her lips and tongue can do wonders that a hole can't :-) Again, its purely personal preference.

[freethinker]

Originally Posted by peanut123

Your question is rather silly. If the condom does not break, then of coz anal is safer since there is no fluid exchange. BBBJ carries a moderate risk of STDs since you are not protected.

Preference is of course a purely personal choice. I prefer BJ to Anal. Anal is disgusting to me, but this is purely subjective. To me, putting your dick into an anus is like putting your dick into a toilet bowl. Besides, I'm sure its pretty painful for the girl. Why the hell would I want to cause her pain ? And... the chances of the condom breaking is higher than vaginal sex, since the ass is usually tighter.

Lastly, one of the good things about BJs is that theres alot of variety, in that her lips and tongue can do wonders that a hole can't :-) Again, its purely personal preference.

Yeah, you are right.

Any idea what are the chances of condom breakage during anal versus BBBJ causing HIV?

I am just wondering if condom breakage is also quite low percentage, why do most FLs do not provide anal but just BBBJ.

[peanut123]

Originally Posted by freethinker

Yeah, you are right.

Any idea what are the chances of condom breakage during anal versus BBBJ causing HIV?

I am just wondering if condom breakage is also quite low percentage, why do most FLs do not provide anal but just BBBJ.

Question : would you rather shove a 6 inch banana into your mouth or into your asshole ? If you can answer that, then you have answered your own question. Just because they are WL does not mean they are impervious to pain and discomfort.