BOOBMANIAC, let me know if same person. I will share my experience here for all to read.
Most likely different person altogether.
Your description..."Is it at a hotel near Bug**? She offer bbbj and also top up for sex? Short aunty with bad attitude? Boobs big but fake?". That is totally not the same. But you seem to have to an axe to grind too.... face palm.
The ML in the spotlight has huge natural boobs and a good attitude, humble and hardworking when I visited her many years ago. So I'm surprised at the hullabaloo unless she's changed. But based on the punter's very loud, aggressive, scorched-earth behaviour, I tend to suspect that there's more to this than meets the eye.
Your description..."Is it at a hotel near Bug**? She offer bbbj and also top up for sex? Short aunty with bad attitude? Boobs big but fake?". That is totally not the same. But you seem to have to an axe to grind too.... face palm.
The ML in the spotlight has huge natural boobs and a good attitude, humble and hardworking when I visited her many years ago. So I'm surprised at the hullabaloo unless she's changed. But based on the punter's very loud, aggressive, scorched-earth behaviour, I tend to suspect that there's more to this than meets the eye.
Yes bro, I explained myself many times and I agreed that solely stepping on a landline does not warrant such aggressive action. You may take a look at my posts if you could spare the time.
You can call her fat & ugly in this forum as response to the bad record, that's fair I respect that. But exposing address and calling authorities that's totally not cool. What if there are other MLs staying in the same building. They will become collateral dmg because of this rampage.
Yes bro I understand but sometimes collateral damage is inevitable, just like during a war. Right or wrong just depends on your perspective.
Also to emphasise again, it is not about being old and ugly which everyone is quoting. It's about the audacity to defame someone despite being subpar, especially when nothing was done to her at all.
Yes bro I understand but sometimes collateral damage is inevitable, just like during a war. Right or wrong just depends on your perspective.
Also to emphasise again, it is not about being old and ugly which everyone is quoting. It's about the audacity to defame someone despite being subpar, especially when nothing was done to her at all.
Wa biangz a, use War as metaphor somemore, spare us your lame justifications lah. People here pissed is because you broke the basic of unwritten rule by openly state address plus somemore report to authorities. You might as well go meet your MP and report it too. You got your revenge liao, the ML now out of action and likely rtc soon, we declare you victorious and the justifice is served in your warped opinion. So spare us all your reasoning please leh. You have all the publicity past days, don't mind please let status quo restore here. TYVM.
Yes bro I understand but sometimes collateral damage is inevitable, just like during a war. Right or wrong just depends on your perspective.
Also to emphasise again, it is not about being old and ugly which everyone is quoting. It's about the audacity to defame someone despite being subpar, especially when nothing was done to her at all.
Even if you have no other agenda, and you indeed do have the noblest intention, your "inevitable collateral damage" defence is fallacious. Collateral damage is only justifiable if it is the inevitable consequence of achieving a much greater goal - e.g. getting rid of the key members of an evil terrorist group resulting in a few civilian casualties.
The purported aim of your course/s of action is to rid the playground of one landmine of a ML, but it may possibly result in causing harm to other MLs in the area, plus putting a further squeeze on the availability of rooms for MLs to operate in (enforcement will render these units unsafe for further use).
Do you not understand the consequence of your stupidity? Or are you really that dumb?
02-02-2023, 08:21 AM
t Similar Threads
